Re: [romanceconlang] Question on Italic languages

From: Anton Sherwood (bronto@pobox.com)
Date: Sun May 04 2003 - 07:18:47 EST

Next message: Padraic Brown: "Re: AW: [romanceconlang] Kerno question for the esteemed Mr. Brown, Esq."
Previous message: Isaac Penzev: "Re: [romanceconlang] Re: A translation exercise! Date: Sat, 3 May 2003 23:57:42 +0300"
In reply to: Jan van Steenbergen: "Re: [romanceconlang] Question on Italic languages"
Next in thread: Barry Garcia: "Re: [romanceconlang] Question on Italic languages"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> Anton Sherwood skrzypszy:
>> Does anyone maintain a classified list of conlangs
>> descended from natlangs?

Jan van Steenbergen wrote:
> [...] Is there anything in particular you would like to know?

I just want to mention the phenomenon in my blog, as a branch
of `the secret vice' that I find especially charming.

-- 
Anton Sherwood, http://www.ogre.nu/

Next message: Padraic Brown: "Re: AW: [romanceconlang] Kerno question for the esteemed Mr. Brown, Esq."
Previous message: Isaac Penzev: "Re: [romanceconlang] Re: A translation exercise! Date: Sat, 3 May 2003 23:57:42 +0300"
In reply to: Jan van Steenbergen: "Re: [romanceconlang] Question on Italic languages"
Next in thread: Barry Garcia: "Re: [romanceconlang] Question on Italic languages"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Fri Oct 03 2003 - 12:19:46 EST