Re: [romanceconlang] My romance lang.

From: Muke Tever (muke@frath.net)
Date: Sun May 18 2003 - 07:10:38 EST


From: "Nik Taylor" <yonjuuni@earthlink.net>
> Isaac Penzev wrote:
> > Well, I meant _kuru_ and _suru_. As for _iku_, it shows irregularity only in
> > past stem forms: _itta_, _itte_, _ittara_ etc., right?
>
> Right. It's not as irregular as kuru and suru, but it's still
> irregular.

Irregular compared to what, though? K-stem verbs do have /i/ for /k/ in such
forms, but there's an /i/ there already, so I wouldnt be surprised if -tta, etc.
was the _regular_ outcome. Are there any "regular" verbs ending in -iku,
past -iita? (I cant find any offhand...)

*Muke!

-- 
http://www.frath.net/


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Fri Oct 03 2003 - 12:19:46 EST