Re: [romanceconlang] Pronouns Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 12:34:45 +0300

From: Isaac Penzev (isaacp@ukr.net)
Date: Mon Apr 14 2003 - 03:29:27 EST

• Next message: brucezhang_11: "An exciting place for plus-sized singles!"
• Previous message: Adam Walker: "Re: [romanceconlang] Pronouns"
• In reply to: Padraic Brown: "Re: [romanceconlang] Pronouns"
• Next in thread: Adam Walker: "demonstratives"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Adam Walker wrote:

> ju = I
> tu = you (inf)
> vosu /-a = you (formal m/f)
> jun = he
> jan = she
> jid = it

I like it. But wouldn't 1sn |ju| and 3snm |jun| be too close to one another,
causing confusion? Maybe *ego could develop other way, like e.g. |ek|?

Padraic Brown wrote:

> That's a neat system!

I second it.

--
Yitzik

• Next message: brucezhang_11: "An exciting place for plus-sized singles!"
• Previous message: Adam Walker: "Re: [romanceconlang] Pronouns"
• In reply to: Padraic Brown: "Re: [romanceconlang] Pronouns"
• Next in thread: Adam Walker: "demonstratives"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Fri Oct 03 2003 - 12:19:46 EST