From: Padraic Brown (elemtilas@yahoo.com)
Date: Mon Apr 14 2003 - 03:34:53 EST
--- Adam Walker <carrajena@yahoo.com> wrote:
> ju = I
> tu = you (inf)
> vosu /-a = you (formal m/f)
This I like, the m/f distinction. Is there a
reason it doesn't happen in the informal forms?
I also like the t- / v- split for normal / formal
in _both_ numbers.
> jun = he
> jan = she
> jid = it
I like the sound of these. It almost looks like
unus/-a/-um might have been the cause of some
contamination in there, along with id.
> nos = we
> tus = you (inf pl)
> vosus /-as = you (formal pl m/f)
> juns/jans/jids = they
Same as above, especially the addition of tu to
the plural normal form.
That's a neat system!
> Comments?
Only one: you _really_ need to do this in plain
text with a conventinal quoting scheme! None of
the other yahoo users' mais come out all screwy
(and marginally legible) like yours do. There is
a mail options link that can take care of this
problem!
Padraic.
=====
parla, mays ben parla; et pharleir becko il maboun.
.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Fri Oct 03 2003 - 12:19:46 EST