Re: [romanceconlang] ser/estar & por/para

From: Padraic Brown (elemtilas@yahoo.com)
Date: Sun Apr 13 2003 - 07:36:19 EST


--- Christophe Grandsire
<christophe.grandsire@free.fr> wrote:

> Hey, I never said it would be so in Maggel!

La goueritats!

> ;))) Moreover, in order to create
> something difficult to use and unintuitive, you
> first have to recognise what's
> easy to use and logical ;)))))) .

Ah! That presents us with a conundrum: my L1 is
English, so the difficult and unintuitive are
frequently what is also easy and logical. [I
mean, what could be easier or more logical than
the strong verb system, eroded as it is!? ;) ]
Therefore, for me a maggelatious language should
look something like Esperanto, as far as
structure and such is concerned. Sometimes what
is familliar is most maggelatious! ;))))

Padraic.

=====
'n aon le prims, bes et 'mbrach;
'n aon le cerch, futeur et lugh;
'n aon le ters, dofert a' afert;
'n aon le coueart, y chorn ce quei mi tetulli-el!

.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Fri Oct 03 2003 - 12:19:46 EST