Re: [romanceconlang] Romance to be

From: Dan Jones (dan@feuchard.fsnet.co.uk)
Date: Tue May 21 2002 - 10:31:47 EST


Adam Walker escreva:
>Infinitive
>
>Latin esse
>Spanish ser

from Vulgar Latin sedere "to sit"

>Portugu. ser

ditto

>Catalan e'sser

VL essere, analogical form of esse

>French e^tre

VL stare "to stand, to be located"

>Occitan e`sser

as Catalan

>Italian essere

as Catalan

>Sardini. essere

ditto

>R-R (Sur) e`sser

ditto

>Rumanian a fi

CL fieri "to become"

>Sicilian essiri

as Catalan.

>Present
>1st sg.
>
>Lat. sum
>Spa. soy

VL su: (i.e., final -m was lost)

>Por. sou

ditto

>Cat. so'(c)

ditto

>Fre. suis

ditto

>Occ. soi

ditto

>Ita. sono

VL sumo:/suno:, from CL sum with regular 1s ending -o: added.

>Sar. so`e

as Spanish, IIRC

>R-R. sun

as Italian

>Rom. si^nt

as Italian, with later analogical levelling with 3p.

>Sic. sugnu

as Italian.

>Pres 2nd sg
>
>Lat. es
>Spa. eres

from CL eris, the future form.

>Por. e's

from CL

>Cat. ets

ditto

>Fre. es

ditto

>Occ. e's

ditto

>Ita. sei

ditto, with initial s- by analogy with other forms

>Sar. ses

ditto

>R-R. eis

from CL

>Rum. es,ti

back formation on 2p estis.

>Sic. si

as Italian

>Pres 3rd sg
>
>Lat. est
>Spa. es

from CL

>Por. e'

ditto

>Cat. e's

ditto

>Fre. est

ditto

>Occ. es

ditto

>Ita. e'

ditto

>Sar. est

ditto

>R-R. ei

ditto

>Rum. e(ste)

ditto

>Sic. e'

ditto

>Pres 1st pl
>
>Lat. sumus
>Spa. somos

from CL

>Por. somos

ditto

>Cat. som

ditto

>Fre. sommes

ditto

>Occ. se'm

ditto

>Ita. siamo

ditto

>Sar. semus

ditto

>R-R. essan

formed on the infinitive essere.

>Rum. si^ntem

IIRC, this is by analogy with 1s and 3p

>Sic. semu

as Spanish

>Pres 2nd pl
>
>Lat. estis
>Spa. sois

from VL sotis, by analogy with 1s, 1p and 3p

>Por. sois

ditto

>Cat. sou

ditto

>Fre. e^tes

from CL

>Occ. se'tz

from CL sitis, the subjuctive form, IIRC

>Ita. siete

ditto

>Sar. sedzis

ditto

>R-R. essas

formed on infinitive

>Rum. si^ntet,i

by analogy with 1s, 3p, 1p

>Sic. siti

as Italian

>Pres. 3rd pl
>
>Lat. sunt
>Spa. son

from VL son

>Por. sa(tilde)o

ditto

>Cat. so'n

ditto

>Fre. sont

ditto

>Occ. son

ditto

>Ita. sono

ditto

>Sar. sun

ditto

>R-R. ein

formed on infinitive

>Rum. si^nt

as Spanish

>Sic. si/sunnu

ditto

>While many of these Romance terms are clearly derived from the Latin word,
>many others are clearly NOT and some I'm just not quite sure about.
>
>It would seem that only 6 of the infinitives (Cat. Occ. Ita. Sard. R-R and
>Sic.) come from the Latin infinitive. Whence do the otheres derive?
>
>With the Present 1st sg it looks like 6 come from sum.
>
>With the 2nd sg and 2nd pl it looks like only 2 come from the Latin.
>
>I'm assuming that the others are suppletive forms and not out right
>coinages. Which verms do the other forms come from???

All of these are derived from Latin, but changes came about through analogy
with other forms or the infinitive (all the plural forms in Rhaetic) or due
to phonological developments making differentiation different, e.g. es and
est would have converged in Spanish, so es was replaced, es would normally
have given *ei in Italian, so an initial s- was added to fully distinguish
from e'.

Dan

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Uómatra udantós névesto filí noriuláns uá
pátreme soncerrant déva Alánziae oronévio



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Fri Oct 03 2003 - 12:19:45 EST