From: BP Jonsson (bpj@NETG.SE)
Date: Thu Jan 18 2001 - 03:52:27 EST
At 17:28 2001-01-14 -0600, Eric Christopherson wrote:
>^ Is <pora> a conjunction of pol + a, or something separate? And is it
>pretty much like <para> in Spanish? (And where did <para> come from?)
According to Meyer-L�bke Sp. _para_ is a compounded form of
PER. Unfortunately he does not say *what* PER was compounded with to
arrive at _para_, but probably it was AD.
Catalan has _pera_, BTW.
/BP 8^)>
-- B.Philip Jonsson mailto:bpX@netg.se (delete X) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~__ A h-ammen ledin i phith! \ \ __ ____ ____ _____________ ____ __ __ __ / / \ \/___ \\__ \ /___ _____/\ \\__ \\ \ \ \\ \ / / / / / / / \ / /Melroch\ \_/ // / / // / / / / /___/ /_ / /\ \ / /Melarocco\_ // /__/ // /__/ / /_________//_/ \_\/ /Eowine__ / / \___/\_\\___/\_\ Gwaedhvenn Angelmiel\ \______/ /ah/ /_adar Merthol naun ~~~~~~~~~Cuinondil~~~\________/~~~\__/~~~Noolendur~~~~~~ || Lenda lenda pellalenda pellatellenda cuivie aiya! || "A coincidence, as we say in Middle-Earth" (JRR Tolkien)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Fri Oct 03 2003 - 12:19:45 EST