Re: [romanceconlang] Re: Fortunatian number system

From: Padraic Brown (elemtilas@yahoo.com)
Date: Fri Jun 06 2003 - 07:17:08 EST


--- habarakhe4 <theophilus88@hotmail.com> wrote:

> > Is that a final [s] > [x]? Fachyqui!?
> >
> No!
> /s/ [s] > /x/ [S] (Old Castilian/Portugese
> orthographic use)

Ah, I see. I've always liked the sound of final
[S].

> So what is the difference between logs and
> llockes?

Er, they're spelled different? The official
reason is that the first one is Brithenig
influenced, the other is the native form. Only
problem is, the Brithenig version is spelled
with a typically Kerno single initial L, while
the native form is spelled with a typically
Brithenig double LL. K' ystrang!

Padraic.

=====
Ces ystes llockes ne puhoeis pass evitar:
logs le nacier-si
logs le morir-si
logs l' enterreir-si.

.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Fri Oct 03 2003 - 12:19:46 EST