An interesting text

From: John Cowan (jcowan@reutershealth.com)
Date: Sun May 25 2003 - 16:47:53 EST

• Next message: Jan van Steenbergen: "Re: [romanceconlang] An interesting text"
• Previous message: Nik Taylor: "Re: [romanceconlang] Re: My romance lang."
• Next in thread: Jan van Steenbergen: "Re: [romanceconlang] An interesting text"
• Reply: Jan van Steenbergen: "Re: [romanceconlang] An interesting text"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

I ran into this interesting text today.

Praetor suae praefucus pod post exac Bansae fust, suae pis op eizois com
atrud ligud acum herest, auti pru medicatud manim aserum eizazunc
egmazum pas eaiscen ligis scriftas set, ne phim pruhipid mais
zicolois X nesimois.

-- 
John Cowan jcowan@reutershealth.com www.ccil.org/~cowan www.reutershealth.com
I must confess that I have very little notion of what [s. 4 of the British
Trade Marks Act, 1938] is intended to convey, and particularly the sentence
of 253 words, as I make them, which constitutes sub-section 1. I doubt if
the entire statute book could be successfully searched for a sentence of
equal length which is of more fuliginous obscurity. --MacKinnon LJ, 1940

• Next message: Jan van Steenbergen: "Re: [romanceconlang] An interesting text"
• Previous message: Nik Taylor: "Re: [romanceconlang] Re: My romance lang."
• Next in thread: Jan van Steenbergen: "Re: [romanceconlang] An interesting text"
• Reply: Jan van Steenbergen: "Re: [romanceconlang] An interesting text"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Fri Oct 03 2003 - 12:19:46 EST