Re: [romanceconlang] Pater Noster in Wenedyk, second try

From: Anton Sherwood (bronto@pobox.com)
Date: Tue May 06 2003 - 03:41:29 EST

Next message: Isaac Penzev: "Re: [romanceconlang] Passives Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 22:06:51 +0300"
Previous message: Jan van Steenbergen: "Re: [romanceconlang] Romance triplet"
In reply to: Jan van Steenbergen: "Pater Noster in Wenedyk, second try"
Next in thread: Christian Thalmann: "Re: Pater Noster in Wenedyk, second try"
Reply: Christian Thalmann: "Re: Pater Noster in Wenedyk, second try"
Reply: Jan van Steenbergen: "Re: [romanceconlang] Pater Noster in Wenedyk, second try"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Jan van Steenbergen wrote:
> . . . U awnierzy twej rzen'. . . .

I had fun translating it back to Latin. A couple of questions:
What's the source of the particle <u>?
What form underlies <awnierzy> - a Romance future <advenirat>?

I passed it along to my father (who is fluent in Esperanto, Italian and
Spanish); he asks whether `Wendish' is related to `Veneti'.

-- 
Anton Sherwood, http://www.ogre.nu/

Next message: Isaac Penzev: "Re: [romanceconlang] Passives Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 22:06:51 +0300"
Previous message: Jan van Steenbergen: "Re: [romanceconlang] Romance triplet"
In reply to: Jan van Steenbergen: "Pater Noster in Wenedyk, second try"
Next in thread: Christian Thalmann: "Re: Pater Noster in Wenedyk, second try"
Reply: Christian Thalmann: "Re: Pater Noster in Wenedyk, second try"
Reply: Jan van Steenbergen: "Re: [romanceconlang] Pater Noster in Wenedyk, second try"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Fri Oct 03 2003 - 12:19:46 EST