From: Adam Walker (carrajena@yahoo.com)
Date: Sat Mar 22 2003 - 02:10:34 EST
Jan van Steenbergen <ijzeren_jan@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
--- Adam Walker skrzypszy:
> Oh, that's nice. How long did it take you to record that?
You know, the whole thing started on Conlang, where Sally Caves asked a few of
us why we didn't go out and buy a microphone. Then I realized I actually had
one, and started recording immediately. It was so much fun, that it didn't cost
much time at all. For this Pater Noster something like 10 times, or half an
hour...
> It's so fluent and so clear. I'm envious.
<blushing> Why, thanks!
> But I'll have to fainally work out my verb conjugations before I can do that!
I would surely like to listen to Carrejena (sorry that I don't recall the
correct spelling right now).
Jan
*********
Me too. *hopeless expression*
And no problem about the name. You only missed it by one letter. That's pretty impressive. It's CarrAgena.
Actually I did decide on the regular conjugation for -ari, -eri and -iri verbs in the present tense and I have provisional forms for a past tense form and a future tense form.
Present tense
-ari cantari
cantu
cantas
canta
cantamus
cantadis
cantans
-eri deveri
deviu
deves
devi
devemus
devedis
devens
-iri sufeliri
sufiliu
sufilis
sufili
sufilimus
sufilidis
sufiliuns
The past tense form that I've worked out is either the regular past OR a historic past. How many romancelangs have a non-auxiliary form for their regular everyday past tense usage?
ADam
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Fri Oct 03 2003 - 12:19:46 EST