Simple tenses only Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 15:51:10 +0200

From: Isaac A. Penzev (isaacp@ukr.net)
Date: Tue Dec 17 2002 - 07:01:41 EST

• Next message: Jan van Steenbergen: "Re: [romanceconlang] Simple tenses only"
• Previous message: habarakhe4 : "Fortunatian Pater Noster (was Re: New Language)"
• Next in thread: Jan van Steenbergen: "Re: [romanceconlang] Simple tenses only"
• Reply: Jan van Steenbergen: "Re: [romanceconlang] Simple tenses only"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Shalom, ppl!
While designing tense system in Rumiya, I came to conclusion that I want to
avoid complex tense forms like Passé Composé. Conhistoricly it is explained
by Arabic influence. I know that Galician has only simple tense forms. Do
you know any other Romance languages with such a feature? What is its
origin?
Yitzik
~~~~~~~~~~~~~

• Next message: Jan van Steenbergen: "Re: [romanceconlang] Simple tenses only"
• Previous message: habarakhe4 : "Fortunatian Pater Noster (was Re: New Language)"
• Next in thread: Jan van Steenbergen: "Re: [romanceconlang] Simple tenses only"
• Reply: Jan van Steenbergen: "Re: [romanceconlang] Simple tenses only"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Fri Oct 03 2003 - 12:19:45 EST