From: Jan van Steenbergen (ijzeren_jan@yahoo.co.uk)
Date: Sat Aug 24 2002 - 19:02:15 EST
--- Barry Garcia wrote:
> I agree mostly :). Montreiano in writing would write de emi as "d'emi",
> and it does this with simple nouns: d'aguila. Same with la - l'aguila.
Yeah, but that is (or at least feels like) something different.
> >How do you handle the plural?
> >
> Hum. Hadn't really considered that yet (silly silly), but i think
> logically it would be: Lomis, lotus, losus, lamis, latus, lasus.
>
> I think. Any better ideas?
No, it looks fine.
Next question: what happens when the whole thing is preceded by a preposition?
a - eu - mi > aumi?
de - eu - mi > deumi?
con - eu - mi > cormi?
Jan
=====
"Originality is the art of concealing your source." - Franklin P. Jones
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
http://uk.my.yahoo.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Fri Oct 03 2003 - 12:19:45 EST