CL and VL: the differences

From: Ash (equinus100@hotmail.com)
Date: Tue Aug 20 2002 - 03:38:30 EST

• Next message: Jan van Steenbergen: "Re: [romanceconlang] CL and VL: the differences"
• Previous message: Christophe Grandsire: "Re: [romanceconlang] Language names (was: Greetings and Intro to my projects)"
• Next in thread: Jan van Steenbergen: "Re: [romanceconlang] CL and VL: the differences"
• Reply: Jan van Steenbergen: "Re: [romanceconlang] CL and VL: the differences"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

While we are at the topic of the distinction between classical and vulgar Latins..

It is said that Satiricon by Petronius is the only known Latin work which is written in VL, or something close to that. Can some one point out (or give a link of a site that shows) the key differences between classical Latin and Petronian usage?

Ash

• Next message: Jan van Steenbergen: "Re: [romanceconlang] CL and VL: the differences"
• Previous message: Christophe Grandsire: "Re: [romanceconlang] Language names (was: Greetings and Intro to my projects)"
• Next in thread: Jan van Steenbergen: "Re: [romanceconlang] CL and VL: the differences"
• Reply: Jan van Steenbergen: "Re: [romanceconlang] CL and VL: the differences"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Fri Oct 03 2003 - 12:19:45 EST